I want to offer you a thought experiment today, the crossing of a story about a week in which many political projects sown long ago burst into bloom - “Seeds rarely sprout the moment you plant them” a wise person told me this week. A decisive week, worth sharing with the community so it can decide what to do with this information.
And finally, using the tool that AI is to assemble many elements accumulated over time on this project, in the form of a creative bubbling-effervescence, one night of writing and an experiment of human-machine co-creation written in less than 12 hours. Half-human half-machine, half-sublime half-ridiculous, half-cringe half-original?
I’ll let you make up your own mind.
Audio bonus: 30 raw minutes recorded at 5am while preparing this article (in parallel with 10 AI agents dispatched on research). To hear how it actually gets built.
It’s also a small performance: a spoken dialogue between me and ATIS (my AI partner), where I transmit the narrative arc, the intention, in the fever of the gushing moment. Raw, sometimes clumsy - but it’s that precise moment when autobiographical narrative, action proposal and political cartography cross paths in a single breath. Half-listenable, half-trigger warning, half-vulnerability slightly cute. Not perfect. That’s the whole point.
Why I’m writing to you
40,000 €. That’s what ENSAPB will spend on a static alumni directory in September 2026. Following the Paris-Est model - dead on arrival?
Unless we use it for something else, to lay the foundations of our future community.
I’m writing because I want to invite you Tuesday May 12 at 7pm, on video call (1h30), to talk about this proposal I’m making to you today. To build together a response to this public tender from our school, while at the same time proposing a program for the next board of our ENSA’s alumni association. To take our seats.
→ Jitsi link: meet.jit.si/AEP-feedback2026 (detailed CTA at the bottom)
Before that, here’s how we got here this week, and what we propose to do with it.
Table of contents
1. Stories of bloom from a decisive week
· exposure · ridicule · commitment
· codev-mutual-support kickoff
· the school's seeds blossoming
2. Short term: the 40,000 € directory tender
· 2 economic models (static vs team)
· the APB board is leaving — the moment counts
3. Medium term: the incubator ecosystem
· history of the stalled project
· NAV program (L1 → post-master)
· self-sustaining: directory ↔ mentorship ↔ incubator
4. Political context at ENSAPB
· admin / political org chart
· 5 commissions with alumni seats
· teaching landscape (3 studios)
· AEP doesn't belong to APB
5. Why now — the XL layer
6. CALL TO ACTION — Tuesday May 12, 7pm
────────────────────────────────────
+ Meta epilogue: how this article was produced
(3 acknowledged passes, building public)Conceptual map of the article
(all the inputs we tried to condense from the audio brain dump. In bold caps = developed in this article. The rest = only hinted at.)
STORY-ARTICLE week May 4-10, 2026
(3 braided threads + XL section + building in public epilogue)
│
┌───────────────────┼───────────────────┐
│ │ │
INTIMATE INFRA POLITICAL
body · video deliveries ecosystem
vulnerable solo ENSAPB · AEP
│ │ │
fri walk tue Calendly thu school mtg
sat video wed 3 maps teaching landscape
sun post ↓ 40k DIRECTORY
↓ thu codev HYBRID TEAM
MON RIDICULOUS fri brain INCUBATOR
↓ sat 1h/16h AEP is not APB
3 UNBLOCKINGS +RAG 17 books JIANG ANTITHESIS
↓ AI CASCADE
LUCAS TEARS
XL SECTION
convivial infrastructures
polycentric · sociotechnical
Jiang · bioregions · El Capitan
↓
EPILOGUE BUILDING IN PUBLIC
3 passes · ~250M tokens
coda Lafourcade · Hikmet1. Stories of bloom from a decisive week
From the idea, to last week’s video, to personal commitment within this project, to the connections at ENSAPB blossoming, to the codev, its feedback, and the landing after a week where each day felt like a week.
Shift 1 - Exposure, ridicule, and commitment
Friday May 1st, walking very late at night (or very early in the morning) to give some air to a restless mind, I get this intuition that launching a mutual-support dynamic (codev) requires solid human bonds, ready to show themselves vulnerable in our intimacy.
Great! - I’ll propose this to my friends, and right after, the next day Saturday, I shoot a video, launched at my circle of friends, exposing myself all vulnerable on a humorous tone (because it’s funny too!); even if in the end the proposal is quite blurry for others.
The day after the post, Monday, I wake up feeling completely ridiculous. As if all my friends were moving forward on their serious tracks while I was clowning around online in “come build a community” mode like an enthusiastic teenager. A friend writes that I’m making my actions too personal and that I look like I’m playing guru. It hurts. (I also receive lots of support, and sincere feedback from friends, thank you <3)
That morning where it’s unpleasant to wake up as myself, I do what I had planned; go to François Grabeur’s conference on public utility in the morning at ENSAPB (I’ll talk about it another time). Something untangles inside. On the way out, in ten minutes, three things that had been blocked for months unblock. A teacher accepts to pass mentorship along to her colleagues. Another agrees to support the incubator at the service of students with the management. A third - whom I’ve been pestering for three years in “what do you do with the work after your studio?” mode - we have an exchange that, I think, slightly unblocked this subject.
At lunch, I tell my morning to my brother, an artist, and he tells me: “Between the sublime and the ridiculous, that’s where the artist is alive when they’re vulnerable.” And: “to avoid this exposure, many artists work tirelessly to be so good at execution that no one risks making fun of them, but they can lose the alive side of their work, that moment of showing themselves naked, vulnerable to the audience.”
I didn’t answer. I had tears in my eyes. Not from sadness. From recognition. A sentence that changes the story. The morning’s ridiculousness is no longer something to avoid. It became the condition for being true.
Shift 2 - The codev-mutual-support kickoff
Thursday evening, codev at the PBC bar. Before going, I’m really scared. I yell a bit, alone at home, just to get the energy out. Three people come. One who got lost on the way (terrible! so much energy to organize an event & I gave the wrong address…) and two friends who drop by to support me <3
The big success of that evening was the facilitation; that is the hosting, here’s the brief outline:
CODEV KICKOFF · 1h30 · ~10 people at the bar
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
WELCOME "we start by playing"
ICEBREAKER → ANIMAL + SOUND (liberating ridicule)
23 min → STORM WARNING (light to deep)
→ ANONYMOUS PAPERS, read + raise hand
« all these hands, that's why »
INTRODUCE → SPEED DATING 3 levels
25 min XL alien · M friend · S journey
→ REVEAL: your partner introduces you
« introduce me badly, banned for life » 😄
CODEV BRIDGE → MOVING DEBATE
17 min struggles (few↔many) · loneliness (rare↔always)
→ TRIOS + check-in invented together
→ APP + QR CODE: needs / offers
weekly format 1h30/week
CLOSING → ONE FINAL WORD each · Jules last
10 min → SYMPHONY (collective rhythm)
« see you in a week »
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
DRINKS + concertThis facilitation made it possible in 1h30 for everyone to meet with lightness (laughter and meeting games) and depth (proposals to share on important topics). It also let me address the cringe factor of my mutual-support proposal, to make visible that in a profession of experts who carry many responsibilities, having doubts means being vulnerable, despite the statistics.
The main feedback that came out: my proposal (1h30/week to discuss our problems) is misaligned with the needs: also support each other in our projects, have a referent (mentor), and talk around collective subjects that cross the profession (health, AI, organization…).
It was nice to iterate quickly, to get this honest feedback on needs, and to adapt. But it also requires being ready to take a lot of questioning - being personally engaged in it implies me totally.
Shift 3 - The school’s seeds blossom
Same Thursday May 7th, at ENSAPB, I see: Stéphanie Guyard (head of communications), Nathalie Guerrois (deputy to the Director of Studies), Alexis Markovics (Director of Studies), met during the organization of the FMA in 2024, during 5 months of work with the ENSA. From our collaboration came back projects, subjects, notably the need for a directory that would fulfill several functions: making the community visible, surveying its needs, animating it through mentorship.
Here’s a micro-summary of the functional program we sketched together:
APB DIRECTORY — functional program
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
Phase Compl.
ALUMNI PROFILES
· base info · thematic tags 1 L
· pro path · availability indic. 1-2 L-M
· visibility gradation 3 M
CARTOGRAPHY
· interactive map · clusters 2 M
· territorial filters 2 L
SHOWCASING WORK
· final projects · school articles 2 M-H
· non-conv. paths · publications 3 L-M
CONNECTIONS
· protected contact · job offers 1 L-M
· thematic forum · mentorship 3 H-M
RESOURCES
· tool sharing · testimonials 2-3 L-M
· events calendar 2 L
GOVERNANCE
· shared admin school/asso 1 M
· editorial committee · anon stats 3 L-M
TECHNICAL
· simple form · annual update 1-2 L-M
· interop with school com services 2 H
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
Phase : 1 essential · 2 important · 3 desirable
Compl. : L low · M medium · H highHere’s the material. Now the question: who builds it, how, with what money.
II. Short term; the public tender, the 40,000 € directory
Nathalie Guerrois, formerly in charge of the “alumni placement observatory”, skilled in administrative engineering, is the person through whom the ENSA obtained all the public subsidies we’ll talk about today: 10,000 € + 30,000 € for a directory. That is 40,000 € total, earmarked by the school for an alumni system based on the Paris-Est model. She’s also the one who, two years ago, secured 40k€ for the FMA, and a year ago, 50k€ for the ENSAPB incubator. (More on that latter one below.)
The directory: a static site, or a budget envelope to animate the community? The Paris-Est model, a static directory, or as in other ENSAs a SaaS like AlumnForce (~8,000 € setup + 1,800 to 4,200 €/year subscription 1). A clean, professional, recognized tool. And one that no one is going to use.
A directory of 8,000 names of which 200 are up to date is not a directory. It’s a cemetery.
Putting 40,000 € into an alumni website is a lot of public money for a result - via the conventional route - that has little chance of succeeding, or of being useful.
Putting 40,000 € into a team that builds a low-cost digital tool thanks to AI building the infra leaves budget to animate the community, organize regular events.
How to animate this community? Through connecting individuals’ needs with other community members’ skills. (For example, the app I built this week for that.)
Then we can connect these needs <> skills (codev) on a regular rhythm, by video call, add mentorship (long-term, intergenerational follow-up), and thematic workshops (e.g. health, career switching, disputes, AI…).
What 40,000 € really is worth in 2026
What can you do with 40k€? How much does a static directory cost if it’s built by AI, and how much money is left to animate the community? How to make a viable economic model out of it beyond the subsidies?
To get an order of magnitude: for a freelancer at 50€/h, 40k€ = 800 hours of work, that is 100 days full-time, four months of work (at 20 days per month). So we could also have 4 positions at 0.25 FTE (full-time equivalent) for 4 months?
Several ways to configure the figures, to envision the setup. If we refine, the most polished proposal would be:
At 40,000 €/year, what’s really doable in a hybrid economic model:
- 2 civic-service positions (1,428 €/year each in association cost, the rest paid by the State, 6-12 months)
- 2 part-time salaried roles (senior facilitation + dev/product, ~15-16 k€/year fully-loaded each)
- 1 editorial work-study (cofinanced by employer + OPCO, ~5-8 k€/year asso cost)
- If the community animation (mentorship/codev) catches on, progressively set up an income-adjusted subscription for each member.
Total: ~43-50 k€/year for a real team with clear mandates. And if we extend the scope L1→post-master, we unlock CROUS, Ministry of Culture, regions, foundations.
Many subjects to develop around the economic question. For now it’s just an open reflection, to discuss together. One of the metrics we could highlight is the number of people who helped each other (mutual-aided) this month, the jobs found through connections, the increase in partnerships with AssoB (the ENSA’s junior enterprise, which mediates between companies and students), but also the apprenticeship tax collected (a stake for ENSAPB).
DIRECTORY, program
- Survey the community’s needs
- Animate, through facilitation, encounter, bonds, care.
- Cross; interweave the threads of the ecosystem that ENSAPB is, where one actor is missing to operate an evolution of its infrastructures: the involvement of the 8k graduates in its functioning, through its bodies.
Three actions, one team to hold them, and thus create a collective, local, convivial infrastructure.
Let’s see the last project proposed, which would gather all the threads, the ENSAPB incubator. Then we’ll see the actor dynamics and the school’s operating org chart.
Breaking news! The APB board is leaving
The president, the secretary, the treasurer: they’re leaving. 3 people remain, including me. It’s exactly the moment when your perspective counts.
If the 40,000 € allows financing a team to build the directory, we can pay ourselves while building the structure. Not individual salaried jobs. Funded collective construction. Like architects who build their own association house before letting others in.
And we politicize the bylaws. We inscribe an explicit mandate in them: alternative practices, intergenerational links, AEP as a transversal project. An association of 8,000 alumni with bylaws limited to “managing former students” is an under-used infrastructure. The void in the bylaws is not an oversight.
The official ENSAPB tender arrives most likely in September. We have 4 months to build the proposal. But no time to wait alone.
3. Medium term; the incubator ecosystem
The directory is just one node. Next to it, another project: the APB incubator under construction (50,000 € earmarked by the State, Ministry of Culture program, in connection with the European LMDE reform, an injunction to better link higher studies and professional practice).
Three incubators of this type exist in IdF:
- Échelle 1 (Marne-la-Vallée, created 2016, ~140 young structures over 10 years 2)
- Banc d’essai (Paris-La-Villette, launched 2025, max 20/cohort)
- ENSAPB (stalled, ours)
History of the incubator project; the project is stalled
A year and a half of discussion in the APB professions commission. The commission’s leadership, made up without any alumni, wanted to orient the program toward prestige firms for “international fame”. Public money to help people who already have resources. At the only meeting where APB was consulted, I got turbo-pissed-off. The mission of public money is to support those who struggle, to redistribute opportunities, not to cover niches that already have many resources.
And this project was a bit of a scandal, because after the success of the FMA at school two years ago, an administrative position appeared at ENSA to set up this incubator project. But it was “attributed internally” to the one whom the outgoing director had chosen somewhat behind closed doors. We knew it was cronyism, and a year later, nothing had happened with this project and the position was not renewed.
The program: better articulating the studies-to-profession transition
The idea is to map the needs that emerged by year of study, propose training (in the form of conference cycles?) to let the community speak on subjects that should be covered during studies, and after the diploma.
NAV - care and transmission program
════════════════════════════════════════
L1 methodology · health · digital wisdom
L2 first choices · start of research
L3 digesting heavy load · end of L
Gap yr travel · meaning · introspection
M1 autonomy · thesis · profession?
M2 final project + thesis · landing
Post org. × piloting × incubator
L1 mentorship culture → endures beyond
════════════════════════════════════════Let’s create our own training to operate our transitions toward healthier, more fulfilling and engaged practices, using the community’s collective intelligence to create our resources, record thematic and collective conferences with this money, and broadcast them for free on YouTube.
The idea, in the end, is an ecosystem of practices radiating from a common node. (A dedicated article will cover this topic later.)
And this program generates, by accumulation, something self-sustaining, intertwined with the animated-directory:
EXTENDED NAV - self-sustaining ecosystem
═══════════════════════════════════════
LEVEL 1 University courses L1 → final project
LEVEL 2 Start of working life · career switches
LEVEL 3 Building together
│
┌───────────┴──────────────┐
│ │
ECO LOOP COMMUNITY LOOP
Incubator pays Mentorship weaves
mentorship the network
│ │
└───────────┬──────────────┘
▼
SELF-SUSTAININGTwo feedback loops. The incubator funds the mentorship. The mentorship weaves the network. The network feeds the incubator. The system is funded by what it produces.
4. Political context at ENSAPB
ENSA’s administrative and political org chart, and accessible levers (Solenn Guével, OFQA October 2023)
To set up these projects (the incubator in particular), the future APB board needs to get involved in the school bodies that decide on these projects, and which forward them to ENSA’s decision-making bodies.
Solenn Guével - scientific direction at IPRAUS, former CFVE president for 4.5 years - explains in an interview with OFQA, 3 years ago, how the school’s bodies function. The administrative layer and the political layer.
And she notes, without much surprise, that: ★ The 5 thematic commissions with alumni seats → NO LIMIT on number → open doors right now.
Who decides what, in which commission, with what power, under what gaze? This void is not an oversight. It’s this void that we’re starting to fill.
Five thematic commissions with unlimited alumni seats. These are not promises. These are open doors. APB can enter right now, with a mandate, with people who carry it, and bylaws that formalize it.
The teaching landscape, studio veterans
Three studios think architecture as political act at ENSAPB. Here’s the existing state - without judgment, facts, speeds. Without naming names.
TEACHER LANDSCAPE - political forces
═══════════════════════════════════════════
STUDIO POSTURE SPEED
───────────────────────────────────────────
Heritage "move on to ◀ brake
Prospective something else"
follows, doesn't ▶ neutral
lead the way
publishes ◀ control
themselves
───────────────────────────────────────────
Cousin studio green light got ▶ open
not executed
precedent exists → potential
───────────────────────────────────────────
Metropolitan long, patient, ▷ patient
Interface wounded
commitment ◀ reactivable
injury
open posture → open
═══════════════════════════════════════════We inherit a map of natural allies with sometimes antagonistic forces, but globally supportive. It’s up to us to redraw the real territory - without pointing fingers, simply restoring where each one stands.
AEP doesn’t belong to APB (the scale is wider)
A precision that matters. APB is ONE lever for AEP, not its container. AEP crosses the schools, and it’s at this inter-school scale that it takes its full political power.
At AMA (Marne-la-Vallée) they are ten years ahead. At other schools, there are pockets searching for themselves. Alongside, non-school partners: collectives, engaged firms, third-spaces. It’s a network, not a chapel.
That’s what makes APB’s local project consistent with a wider horizon, which we’re addressing now.
5. Why now - the XL layer
This article is political because it deals with investment at our local scale: a school, an association, 40,000 €, in a vision of broader action.
But it fits within a wider horizon, that of the runaway acceleration of our global infrastructures (geopolitical crisis triggering rising oil prices and a fragility of world order). Our dependence on oil and its financial system is dragging us into a crisis. One way out is building other infrastructures, on a community scale, of humans, of bioregions sovereign and autonomous in their fundamental resources.
Let’s build our convivial, polycentric, transversal, intergenerational, sociotechnical 3 infrastructures, to propose / repair / create those of a society with a neoliberal narrative, with an imperial, vertical, obsolete and inefficient structure.
Let’s make our study projects acupuncture points on the sick social body. Let’s take inspiration from the many transversal projects, like El Capitan 3 hours from Paris, which has been creating connections for years between elected officials, farmers, parents, teachers, citizens. They built La Coop des Territoires (lacoop.co) to link farmers and experimentation sites 4, and to create local farming sectors that meet the territory’s needs.
Let’s get our heads out of the water to share our acupuncture-of-the-social-body projects, to show through our practice that it’s possible to evolve society’s structures.
Many other architecture projects of political ecology are available on this map, which I’ll present to you more extensively, with the architecture of political ecology project. The meaning: pool our resources and tools to come up for air, to document and feed new practice models, to help each other evolve our own, and to publish our projects and our critical thinking.
More on this in the coming weeks!
6. CALL TO ACTION - Tuesday May 12, 7pm
Who this article is for
This article is for ENSAPB alumni (or neighboring schools), former students or teachers, anyone sensitive to alternative practices in architecture. No need to already be involved in APB or AEP.
Proposal: what we build by September
WHAT WE BUILD BY SEPTEMBER
───────────────────────────────────
1. Response to the directory tender (40k€)
2. Entry into the 5 ENSAPB commissions
3. Politicized APB bylaws
4. Link with the APB incubator
5. AEP as a transversal infrastructureMini-FAQ
What do I need to prepare? Nothing. Come with your questions and your perspective. The goal is to see who wants to build, no deliverables to produce in advance.
Who is it open to? Anyone graduated from or having passed through ENSAPB (or a neighboring school) and sensitive to AEP topics.
What commitment if it speaks to me? Whatever you want. One hour a week if you want to contribute, or just to be in the loop if you want to observe.
RDV
TUESDAY MAY 12, 2026 · 7:00pm → 8:30pm The idea is to talk about this plan before publishing it on the ENSAPB newsletter and find supporters in the community of 8k graduates.
Jitsi link: https://meet.jit.si/AEP-feedback2026
We can do it. Come.
Epilogue
Next week
The next AEP article was supposed to be “AI, wise use”. We keep the title, we shift the angle. First AEP article that talks about AI itself. Between the macro geopolitics and its strict opposite: the embodied stories of those who live inside it, and the collective infrastructures that give them substance.
See you next week.
Meta PS - how this article was produced (3 acknowledged passes)
This text didn’t fall from the sky. It started from an audio brain dump recorded at 5am (35 min, at the top of the article if you want to listen), where I gather all the week’s material. Then three successive passes in acknowledged building public.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
HOW THIS ARTICLE WAS PRODUCED - 3 PASSES
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
1st PASS · NIGHT AI CASCADE (May 10, 5am-5pm)
► audio brain dump 35 min @ 5am
► OPUS pilot extracts the narrative arc
► crossed with personal VAULT (5 years of archives):
. dailies + weeklies of the week
. APB notes + Facilitator
. articles M3-M5 of the Manifesto
. personal archives over 5 years
► dispatch ~17 Sonnet sub-agents in parallel:
wave 1 = vault material (5 agents)
wave 2 = web sources (3 agents)
wave 3 = biz challenge (3 agents)
wave 4 = layered drafting (4 agents)
+ atis-design + atis-media + EN/ES translations
► Opus assembly → V1 published at 5pm
Output: ~4,200-word article + 5 slides + ConvertKit
2nd PASS · HUMAN REWRITE (May 10 evening)
► I reread the published V1
► I REWRITE BY HAND the entire article
► imbued with my tone, not the AI tone
► my phrasings, my turns of phrase, my hesitations
► I identify passages where the material is missing
► I write [[INSERT HERE]] markers at the spots
where I want diagrams to be injected
Gained: the flesh, the breath, the voice
Lost: the smooth AI varnish
3rd PASS · CORRECTION + DEPLOY (May 11 morning)
► OPUS takes over, fixes spelling mistakes
(without touching the tone — hard rule)
► inserts missing diagrams (codev, APB directory)
► redoes the visuals on light background, mobile-first
► adds the table of contents at the start, the meta conclusion here
► deploys: blog FR + EN + ES + ConvertKit + Castopod
► building public acknowledged through to the cost transparency
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════Intelligence is in the chain, not in the LLM. It’s this crossing vault → narrative arc → parallel dispatch → human rewrite → final assembly that produces the quality of the result. Not a magic robot. A tooled system that I pilot, and that I REAPPROPRIATE at every turn.
Total cost: ~250M cumulative tokens (~120€ raw API equivalent across the 3 passes). Claude Max plan: 200€/month.
Disproportionate energy cost, or necessary consumption to help the community emancipate itself?
That’s precisely what the next AEP article, “AI, wise use”, will explore in depth. How to work with these tools without being devoured by them, how to build chains that remain at the service of thought, how AI practice can feed collective infrastructures rather than replacing them.
Coda · Es un derecho de nacimiento
Natalia Lafourcade — Es un derecho de nacimiento
Mi corazón pega fuerte Para gritar a los que nos mienten Y así perseguir a la felicidad Y así perseguir a la felicidad
Es un derecho de nacimiento Es el motor de nuestro movimiento Porque reclamo libertad de pensamiento Si no lo pido es porque estoy muriendo
Es un derecho de nacimiento Comer los frutos que dejan los sueños En una sola voz y sentimiento Y que este grito limpie nuestro viento
Voy a crear un canto para poder exigir Que no le quiten a los pobres lo que tanto les costó construir Para que el oro robado no aprecie nuestro porvenir Y a los que tienen de sobra no les cueste tanto repartir
Voy a elevar mi canto para hacerlos despertar A los que van dormidos por la vida sin querer mirar Para que el trono lleve sangre lleve flores y el mal sanar Para el espíritu elevar y dejarlo vivir en paz
Final PS
When you do an all-nighter really out of passion, this creative and intellectual surge is quite blissful. Vigilance not to burn out though?
If I do not burn, if you do not burn, if we do not burn, how shall the darkness become light?
— Nâzım Hikmet
Thank you for reading.
Jules - Transformations résilientes
Footnotes
-
Public AlumnForce 2025 pricing (official site data and sector estimates). ↩
-
Échelle 1: paris-est.archi.fr/en/formations/echelle-1, created 2016 by ENSA Paris-Est and the Architecture Union. Banc d’essai: paris-lavillette.archi.fr/en/pro-area/incubator-test-benchs/, launched 2025. ↩
-
Dr Jiang, “Game Theory #9: The US-Iran War”, YouTube channel Predictive History. https://youtu.be/jIS2eB-rGv0 ; To be listened to with active skepticism (non-falsifiable eschatological framework, drifts toward antisemitic conspiracy thinking, total blindness on China where he lives). ↩
-
El Capitan / La Coop des Territoires: podcast “Des brouettes et des ailes”, Igor Louboff episode. Site: lacoop.co. Model of transversal third-place in rural area. ↩